Lawyers for my EEOC case charged an arm and a leg

Now they want my first born too.

Some of these lawyers behaved as if they are Judge Judy.  You can't even ask question(s).  I am talking about lawyers here, not a Judge.

For an unemployed and can't secured a job due to defamation of me since the first month working in the Patent and Trademark Office, it's been tough to continue paying the lawyer fees.  

Most of them don't really know what they are doing.  And our judicial system ruled based on the type of lawyer you got, not based on material facts.  I had overwhelming material facts including termination letter and the administrative judge herself said it was a "forced resignation", yet she ruled that I resigned.  

So this is our Judicial System, such gross miscarriage of justice, nothing but a kangaroo court.



Did you hear about a case where a woman fired for being "irresistible"?  In a all male court no less

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/bosses-irresistible-workers_n_2348381.html

IOWA CITY, Iowa -- A dentist acted legally when he fired an assistant that he found attractive simply because he and his wife viewed the woman as a threat to their marriage, the all-male Iowa Supreme Court ruled Friday.

The court ruled 7-0 that bosses can fire employees they see as an "irresistible attraction," even if the employees have not engaged in flirtatious behavior or otherwise done anything wrong. Such firings may be unfair, but they are not unlawful discrimination under the Iowa Civil Rights Act because they are motivated by feelings and emotions, not gender, Justice Edward Mansfield wrote.