March 2017:
In light of the Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch's confirmation that he is a Conservative in interpreting the Law, which I learned from this Hearing means no human emotion (ie, the frozen track driver), that sounds like a robot to me!
When I lookup on how judges examined a case and determine the verdict, ie, to layout Prima Facie, it looks like a computer program flow charts to me, or an algorithm, very much like the Artificial Intelligent (AI) algorithm I used in the late 1980s. Unlike human with limited brain power, this computerized judge has all previous cases at it's "finger tip". Best of all, it doesn't have any of the human flaw such prejudges or emotion, or feel tired; it can work 24/7.
In addition to my experiences with the Judicial system, from the EEOC to now the Civic Court, is just a travesty of justice. I am seriously interested in creating a digital process, from 1st filing the case, to the final verdict, including a computerized judge that is based on the pure interpretation of the law, aka Conservatism. People can either choose a human judge or a computer/robot judge. A human judge will have to sign the final verdict. So, if the difficulty of my pioneer emulation project is a 10, then the difficulty of this robot judge is no more than a 5.
May 1, 2017:
While researching cases on the 4th Court of Appeal and came across this case Bolton v. Colvin, Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit 2017. A very complicated case, and the Appeal court got it right. In light of the EEOC and Federal Court dismissed a run-of-the-mill employment discrimination, I didn't think Judges are capable of handling complex issues. I am very impressed and .....maybe...maybe.....I have a chance of getting my case heard in court?????
Then the next question is, does this Appeal court thoroughly go through every case or above case somehow special?
In light of the Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch's confirmation that he is a Conservative in interpreting the Law, which I learned from this Hearing means no human emotion (ie, the frozen track driver), that sounds like a robot to me!
When I lookup on how judges examined a case and determine the verdict, ie, to layout Prima Facie, it looks like a computer program flow charts to me, or an algorithm, very much like the Artificial Intelligent (AI) algorithm I used in the late 1980s. Unlike human with limited brain power, this computerized judge has all previous cases at it's "finger tip". Best of all, it doesn't have any of the human flaw such prejudges or emotion, or feel tired; it can work 24/7.
In addition to my experiences with the Judicial system, from the EEOC to now the Civic Court, is just a travesty of justice. I am seriously interested in creating a digital process, from 1st filing the case, to the final verdict, including a computerized judge that is based on the pure interpretation of the law, aka Conservatism. People can either choose a human judge or a computer/robot judge. A human judge will have to sign the final verdict. So, if the difficulty of my pioneer emulation project is a 10, then the difficulty of this robot judge is no more than a 5.
May 1, 2017:
While researching cases on the 4th Court of Appeal and came across this case Bolton v. Colvin, Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit 2017. A very complicated case, and the Appeal court got it right. In light of the EEOC and Federal Court dismissed a run-of-the-mill employment discrimination, I didn't think Judges are capable of handling complex issues. I am very impressed and .....maybe...maybe.....I have a chance of getting my case heard in court?????
Then the next question is, does this Appeal court thoroughly go through every case or above case somehow special?
