“no man wants to marry her b/c she is too smart”

So now this is what males from the 3^rd World are saying about me not being married.

What does this do to our young girls, or women all over the world that America is doing this to women in America?

"she doesn't know anything" as promulgated in the bike shop

Just like in the Science and Technology field, where women are seen as NOT wired to do technical jobs, and males are; where people-from-Asia and people with issues (racism, bigotry, hate, oppression of women, psychologically unstable, jealousy, covetous, envious, avaricious, etc.) used this American's conventional believe against women such as I.

Such conventional believe is shared amount the kids in this little bike shop, what chance do women have in the usual male dominated industies?

So, fixing bikes for me where my background is the equivalent of design and built a Tesla when Tesla was in inception.  Even when I only started learning to ride a bike about 6 months ago, but since I ski and rollerblake, I was able to ride a bike on the 1st trial, and is just a matter of practice, which I had been doing consistently.  Additionally, as an engineer, I know how everything works.

So the only problem I had so far is the slanders promulgated, just as in the Science and TEchnology field, that instigated by people-from-Asia; which the people-from-Asia did in this little bike in the middle of nowhere as well, and now using good looking young Asian girls/women to slander me to the males.  They didn't come to buy bikes, they came to slander me such I would be fired or make my life so miserable so that I had to leave, which is what the people-from-Asia been doing since the 1990s as soon as I arrived in the Silicon Valley, later NYC, then the Patent and Trademark Office, now in Arlington County, VA.

What is wrong with saying this

"People don't like her because she is old"?

 This is akin to saying "people don't like you because you are GOING to be old"

When she was young, people she never met in her life said  "no one liked her; no one wanted her; etc"

People with ISSUS (racism, bigotry, hater oppression of women, psychologically unstable, jealousy, covetous, envious, avaricious, etc.)     will find some reason to hate others whenever they get a chance.

All these school shootings can be prevented

if people/parents/teachers are close to their kids and knowing what is going on. 

Working in a Youth non-profit program as a volunteer, I see people such as Stephen and Andrew are such a bad influence on kids. People with issues should not allowed to work with kids. If parents asked their kids about their day in the bike shop, they would get a sense of what is going on.

People with issues (racism, bigotry, oppression of women, psychologically unstable, jealousy, covetous, envious, avaricious, etc) had started the defamation toward me that resulted in the ruined of everything that took my whole life to build, while continue to be sexual harassed, abused and terminated, in addition to physical harm and rape threats; and now the slit of my throat/beheading that was meant to kill me.

So, Stephen is known as a snake in the grass

Very appropriate.  He's been the one that's saying inflammatory things to kids, and the kids acted out on what he said such as shunned me or spreading the "no one liked her here, that's why she is leaving".  Again, I am leaving because I don't want to support racists such as Stephen.

No good deed goes unpunished.

I tried to help the people-from-Asia because they were new in America, just as I am a volunteer to support this non-profit.  But instead, people-from-Asia ruined everything that took my whole life to build by relentlessly slandered me, where people with issues (racism, bigotry, hate, oppression of women, psychologically unstable, jealousy, covetous, envious, avaricious, etc.) such Stephen help spread their slanders relentlessly, and in term, re-enforced the slanders.

In Junior High, I was helping the only 2 girls just arrived from Asia, also helped them to report the bullying by Hispanic/Latino girls, which these Hispanic/Latino girls turned and bullying me.  These girls-just-arrived-from-Asia also bullying too afterward. I reported all these to the Principle, he didn't do anything. The assistant Principle asked him why he didn't do anything, the Principle said “if I have a nickel for every report......”

It seems that, for people with issues, helping others or being nice is a sign of weakness which people with issues to prey on. If I am the nastiest person on earth, people with issues would be afraid and stay away from nasty people.

   

Stephen knew the slit of my throat the first time we met, and I told him at least twice since I started my volunteering. He also had my blog (http://eeoccase.blogspot.com/) where I told how I've been targeted by people-from-Asia that resulted in the attempted beheading that was meant to kill me, and that I've been suffering from PTSD. Stephen knew all this and now trying to push me over the edge so I would kill myself.   

When I just start fixing bikes, Edorado (shop manager) gave me a bike to fix, Stephen took it away thinking I was going to steal it.  Then he had different kids keep asking me whether the bike I was fixing was mine, for weeks.  He was thinking I was going to steal the bikes.  This is demeaning and insulting.  What a racist.  Now that he had also got the kids to practice racism on me, why would I volunteer to support these racists when I tried so hard to stomp it out?

He got issues, one of which is with his own life and his family.  He took that out on people around him and make their life miserable.  That means the kids and everyone around him,

In a place where there are grew-up, people like Stephen would've been ousted, but in this Youth program, Stephen are free to abuse kids such as Omar

Women are now afraid to be smart, especially young girls in K12 school.

after they see what people are doing to me.

I've been afraid of this.  This will put women back for decades, and for generations to come, which is the result of the males-from-Asia/3rd world/Islamic Extremists, as well many American males wanted - the continuation of repressing women and keeping women down.

They are making me an example, in a similar manner as shooting Malala Yousafzai in the head by Islamic Extremists.

Stephen had just told Omar to leave

Omar had enrolled in the youth program to own a bike.

After Omar asked Stephen how to take a tire off, Stephen in term said you should know how to take a tire off.  After Stephen continue his refusal, Omar said in essence "you are not a child".  Stephen told Omar to leave.

I've been talking to Omar.  He is a good kid, mature, bright and respectful.  This should not have happened to Omar.

A Chinese girl told Stephen "no one liked her; no one wanted her"

stood facing toward me where both of them stareing at me.  Stephen asked her why.

This happened around 2pm toady.

This young Chinese girl is about the age of 18-28 years old, about 5'8, slim, with long black hair.

Seems like more and more Asians from Asia, and now Asian-Americans too are coming to tell people around me that "no one wanted her;  etc" so to ruin my life and have me killed.

They are now using young Chinese girls to slander me such people believed without question.  And these young Chinese girls obviously enjoying this type of psychological abuses on another person, from the look on the face of the last 2 young Chinese girls age between 18-28   The psychological abuses continue until I am dead.

Women are now afraid to be smart, especially young girls in K12 school.

This Asian-American girl, a bike buyer

came to the bike shop with a  Caucasian father (?),,,,,,,,,when I say hi to her, she gave me this look as if she hates me with all her heart.  I had never met her in my life.

It tells how far and wide the defamation had spread.  And that's why I am in danger all the time.

Like the Canadian killings by those radicalized by Islamist ideology,  this girl been incited by the defamation to hate me, just like so many in the Patent and Trademark Office and Arlington, VA

Inova Fairfax hospital deliberately falsified my medical record

in such manner that make my slit throat looks like a cut such I can't receive Medicaid or any sort of help.  My medical record from Inova Fairfax Hospital did not reflect the injuries I had, and the record seems like it was produced after the Medicaid request for the record.

As a note, I did NOT want to apply for Medicaid or any form of welfare, but since I don't have insurance due to unemployed as the resulted of wrongful termination, the Hospital and the Arlington Mental Health Agency required patients to apply for Medicaid/Medicare and welfare. It is NOT of my doing on my own.   

This woman (a nurse? At 703-776-4894 called me at 2.51 Oct 21) representing Inova speaking in a smug manner sounds like she enjoyed telling me that "we can't change the medical record so you can receive Medicaid".  I never mentioned anything about Medicaid.  I hope there is karma for racist/miscreant like her.

This made me sick to my stomach.  To what extend do people want to end me?  In non-profit too.

Upon reviewing my Trauma History and Physical report, the report did not jive with what happened to me as depicted in the police report photo as well my own photo, in addition to 5 days of Intensive care and $50,000. During a visit while I was in Intensive Care, Dr. Teicher said I was lucky to be alive as some of the vital organs/nerves connected to the brain just barely missed.  I was unable to eat while I was in the hospital and only liquid food for a month after I left.  Additionally, there was the bleeding where blood soaked through my whole shirt. I've been suffering from PTSD ever since, but were not approve for Medicard to pay for the hospital bill or mental health care.

It is very hard to justify the hospital bill of total ~50K and the traumas I had been experiencing, in particular, page 4  of the description of the slit of my throat of 1.5cm where in the photo it is at least 5inches.  Even the scar left on my neck right now is more than 2.5inches

Inova FairFax Hospital Trauma History and Physical report page 4 

Police photo

Poor kids who do everything right don’t do better than rich kids who do everything wrong

Source: Data from Richard Reeves and Isabel Sawhill

America is the land of opportunity, just for some more than others.

That's because, in large part, inequality starts in the crib. Rich parents can afford to spend more time and money on their kids, and that gap has only grown the past few decades. Indeed, economists Greg Duncan and Richard Murnane calculate that, between 1972 and 2006, high-income parents increased their spending on "enrichment activities" for their children by 151 percent in inflation-adjusted terms, compared to 57 percent for low-income parents.

But, of course, it's not just a matter of dollars and cents. It's also a matter of letters and words. Affluent parents talk to their kids three more hours a week on average than poor parents, which is critical during a child's formative early years. That's why, as Stanford professor Sean Reardon explains, "rich students are increasingly entering kindergarten much better prepared to succeed in school than middle-class students," and they're staying that way.

It's an educational arms race that's leaving many kids far, far behind.

It's depressing, but not nearly so much as this:

Even poor kids who do everything right don't do much better than rich kids who do everything wrong. Advantages and disadvantages, in other words, tend to perpetuate themselves. You can see that in the above chart, based on a new paper from Richard Reeves and Isabel Sawhill, presented at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston's annual conference, which is underway.

Specifically, rich high school dropouts remain in the top about as much as poor college grads stay stuck in the bottom — 14 versus 16 percent, respectively. Not only that, but these low-income strivers are just as likely to end up in the bottom as these wealthy ne'er-do-wells. Some meritocracy.

What's going on? Well, it's all about glass floors and glass ceilings. Rich kids who can go work for the family business — and, in Canada at least, 70 percent of the sons of the top 1 percent do just that — or inherit the family estate don't need a high school diploma to get ahead. It's an extreme example of what economists call "opportunity hoarding." That includes everything from legacy college admissions to unpaid internships that let affluent parents rig the game a little more in their children's favor.

But even if they didn't, low-income kids would still have a hard time getting ahead. That's, in part, because they're targets for diploma mills that load them up with debt, but not a lot of prospects. And even if they do get a good degree, at least when it comes to black families, they're more likely to still live in impoverished neighborhoods that keep them disconnected from opportunities.
It's not quite a heads-I-win, tails-you-lose game where rich kids get better educations, yet still get ahead even if they don't—but it's close enough. And if it keeps up, the American Dream will be just that.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/10/18/poor-kids-who-do-everything-right-dont-do-better-than-rich-kids-who-do-everything-wrong/?wpisrc=nl_wonk&wpmm=1

Related links:
One in four Americans think poor people don't work hard enough
What your 1st-grade life says about the rest of it

A Chinese/Vietnamese family of

parents and one child (policy?) of a 20+ young woman, sounds like a 2nd generation, came to look for a bike, helped by Edorado.  They had defamed me to Edorado.

Congrats to Malala Yousafzai wins the Nobel peace prize 2014

Educated women are being targeted all over the world.  In the Middle East, girls such as Malala are shot in the head meant to kill her. In India, educated women are being raped and with metal pipe/hanged from a tree. In the US, Educated women who excel in the job are fired and/or beheaded such as I by the Science and Tech field; in particular, by people-from-asia.   

By Griff Witte and Brian Murphy October 10 at 8:26 AM

LONDON — A 17-year-old Pakistani girl who survived a Taliban gunshot to the head for her advocacy of female education became the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday, winning alongside an Indian advocate for ending child labor.



Malala Yousafzai, who has emerged as a global spokeswoman for the rights of children after her long recovery, was awarded the prize just a day after the second anniversary of the attack on her in Pakistan’s Swat Valley.

Co-winner Kailash Satyarthi, 60, has been a longtime crusader against child slavery and is credited with saving tens of thousands of lives.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee praised Yousafzai and Satyarthi “for their struggle against the suppression of children and young people and for the right of all children to education.”

By awarding the prize to two advocates for children — one Indian, the other Pakistani — the committee hoped to send a powerful message not only about children’s rights, but also about its hopes for peace on the South Asian subcontinent. In recent days, the two nations have exchanged fire over a disputed border region in some of the most serious clashes in years.

“What we are saying is that we have awarded two people with the same cause, coming from India and Pakistan, a Muslim and a Hindu. It is in itself a strong signal,” Thorbjorn Jagland, chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, told reporters following the announcement.
Of the two winners, Yousafzai is far better known globally.

Yousafzai, the first Nobel winner to have been born in an independent Pakistan, became a worldwide symbol of Taliban abuses after she was critically injured in a 2012 attack by militants who stormed the bus she was riding with other students. At the time of the attack, she was already known across Pakistan for daring to defy the radical Islamist group by speaking out against its policy of denying education to girls.

Rather than shrink from further Taliban threats after her recovery, she instead expanded her advocacy work, writing a best-selling book and giving addresses at major international gatherings, including at the United Nations.

“They thought that the bullets would silence us, but they failed,” Yousafzai said in her U.N. speech. “And then, out of that silence, came thousands of voices.”

Her appeals, however, have angered militants and others in her native country. Some in Pakistan have feared that a high-profile award such as the Nobel would only antagonize the Taliban and trigger further violence. Yousafzai herself has been forced to live in exile in Britain since her recovery.
Nonetheless, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Friday called Yousafzai the “pride of Pakistan.”

“She has made her countrymen proud,” Sharif said. “Her achievement is unparalleled and unequalled. Girls and boys of the world should take the lead from her struggle and commitment.”
Satyarthi is less of a global figure, but he has long been celebrated in India. In making the announcement, Jagland credited Satyarthi with “maintaining Gandhi’s tradition” by leading “various forms of protests and demonstrations, all peaceful, focusing on the grave exploitation of children for financial gain.”

Jagland said there are 168 million child laborers in the world today but noted that the figure is down 78 million from 2000.

Satyarthi has fought against child labor for more than two decades and is credited with helping free tens of thousands of children from harsh working conditions and other forms of forced labor, including in the carpet industry and traveling circuses popular in India.

That work has prompted a backlash. There have been attempts on Satyarthi’s life, and his home was ransacked and his office in New Delhi set on fire in 1994.

“Even as a child, I was passionate about issues related to child labor,” Satyarthi said in an interview with the Times of India this summer. “On my first day of school, I saw a child of my age sitting on the doorsteps of my school along with his father. They were cobblers. It was the first time that I saw a contrast in the lives of two kids. I asked my teacher, we are sitting in the classroom and that boy is sitting outside, working. Why is that?”

Following the announcement, Satyarthi said he was “delighted” by the award, which he described as “recognition of our fight for child rights.”

“I am thankful to the Nobel committee for recognizing the plight of millions of children who are suffering in this modern age,” he said.

The selection of Yousafzai and Satyarthi comes during a tumultuous year that has seen new conflicts emerge and old ones expand.

A proxy war in eastern Ukraine between Russia and the West has left more than 3,500 people dead and a country dismembered, all while raising fears of a new Cold War.

In Iraq and Syria, Islamic State militants have carved out a swath of territory larger than Britain and used it to carry out atrocities against ethnic and religious minorities, while executing American journalists and British aid workers.

The death toll in the Syrian war has more than doubled in the past year, with President Bashar al-Assad’s forces continuing to battle rebels in a conflict that has taken an extraordinary toll on civilian.

A war between Israel and Palestinian militants in Gaza — the third in six years — claimed more than 2,000 lives.

Meanwhile, the Ebola outbreak — enabled by poverty and a lack of quality health care in West Africa — continues to spread, reaching new countries daily.

The selection of two individuals for the 2014 prize follows two years in which the Nobel committee has picked an organization. Last year, the peace prize was awarded to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons amid that group’s efforts to disarm Syria of its stockpile amid a civil war.

In 2012, the prize went to the European Union for helping to “transform most of Europe from a continent of war to a continent of peace.” President Obama won the award in 2009, less than a year into his presidency.

The prize, which comes with a medal and a $1.24 million check, has been awarded annually since 1901. Unlike the Nobel prizes for physics, chemistry, literature, economics and medicine, which are awarded by specialist committees in Sweden, the peace prize recipient is selected by a committee appointed by the Norwegian parliament.

The prize is formally awarded during a ceremony in Oslo City Hall on Dec. 10, the anniversary of the death of Alfred Nobel, who left a fortune in his will to annually honor whoever “shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/taliban-shooting-victim-malala-yousafzai-and-indian-child-rights-activist-share-nobel/2014/10/10/36abecae-505b-11e4-8c24-487e92bc997b_story.html?wpisrc=nl-headlines&wpmm=1

You slandered me, you partake in beheading of me

Any one who partakes in slandering me such as "no one liked her; no one wanted her; etc" or "she needed a man; she checks man out; etc" are inciting sexual harassment, abuses, rape, physical harm and beheading of me.

This is what you are doing to me.

White people think racial discrimination in America is basically over

Whites think discrimination against whites is a bigger problem than bias against blacks

White people think racial discrimination in America is basically over

Comments 260

By Michael A. Fletcher October 8 at 1:39 PM

Protesters perform a "hands up, don't shoot" chant at a memorial in Ferguson, Mo. (AP Photo/St. Louis Post-Dispatch, David Carson) EDWARDSVILLE INTELLIGENCER OUT; THE ALTON TELEGRAPH OUT

Nearly two decades ago, when retired football star O.J. Simpson was acquitted of the murder of his white wife and her friend, a sobering reality of the nation’s racial divide was laid bare: blacks and whites often look at the same set of facts and see different truths. Surveys found that the vast majority of African Americans agreed with the O.J. verdict; most whites did not. The ongoing reaction to the fatal police shooting of an unarmed black teenager in Ferguson, Mo. two months ago, makes clear that the divide continues.

An insightful story by our Post colleague Robert Samuels this morning showed that whites in Ferguson were often surprised by the racial fault lines exposed by the shooting and the sometimes angry protests that followed. They said they had no idea of the simmering tensions between African Americans and police. They did not know that many black residents felt unfairly targeted by the police and unrepresented by city government. And they bristled when protesters portrayed their town as racist.

It turns out that whites' limited awareness about racial problems in Ferguson goes well beyond the St. Louis suburb.  A series of surveys in recent years about Americans’ perceptions of the very existence of racism and racial disparities in our society shows that white people believe the problem of racial bias against blacks has effectively faded as a national issue.

Work by Harvard University professor Michael I. Norton, who examined data from a series of polls through the years, found in 2011 that although both blacks and whites believe anti-black racism has diminished through the decades, whites tend to think it has been all but eliminated.

In many cases, he found, white perceptions of racial disparities diverge far from reality.
For instance, two-thirds of blacks think that African Americans earn make less money than whites, a view in line with official statistics. But just 37 percent of whites believe that blacks make less money than whites, and a narrow majority think black and white’ incomes are about the same. Also, although many objective health measures suggest blacks are in worse overall health than whites, a majority of whites think blacks and whites are equally healthy.

So it is no surprise that just 16 percent of whites believe that there is “a lot” of discrimination in America today, a view held by 56 percent of blacks. What may be surprising is that the polls found that white perceptions of anti-black bias have diminished to the point where they are more now likely to think anti-white discrimination is a bigger problem than bias against blacks. The chart below is from Norton's work.

“It seems to be the case that people take markers of progress differently,” Norton said. “If you are searching around for evidence of continued racism, or you are searching for proof of evidence of a lack of racism, there are always ambiguous findings. “
He explained that the election of a black president to many whites symbolized a culmination of a long march of racial progress, whereas many blacks viewed it as one more step toward a goal that has not yet been achieved.
These differing perceptions were especially vivid in recent polling int he wake of the shooting in Ferguson. A Pew Poll found that overwhelming numbers of blacks believe the events in Ferguson raise important issues about race. They also said the police response went too far, and they lacked confidence in the ongoing shooting investigation.
By contrast, nearly half of whites thought race was getting too much attention in the case, and they were ambivalent about the police response. They also said they had more confidence in the investigation than blacks.

Michael A. Fletcher is a national economics correspondent, writing about unemployment, state and municipal debt, the evolving job market and the auto industry.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/10/08/white-people-think-racial-discrimination-in-america-is-basically-over/?wpisrc=nl-wnkpm&wpmm=1

Americans Cannot Comprehend Evil

Camille Paglia: The Modern Campus Cannot Comprehend Evil

• Camille Paglia
 

Sept. 29, 2014

Getty Images

Paglia is the author of Glittering Images: A Journey Through Art From Egypt to Star Wars.

Young women today do not understand the fragility of civilization and the constant nearness of savage nature

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Why So Many Foreign Fighters Join ISIS

by Taboola

The disappearance of University of Virginia sophomore Hannah Graham two weeks ago is the latest in a long series of girls-gone-missing cases that often end tragically. A 32-year-old, 270-pound former football player who fled to Texas has been returned to Virginia and charged with “abduction with intent to defile.” At this date, Hannah’s fate and whereabouts remain unknown.

Wildly overblown claims about an epidemic of sexual assaults on American campuses are obscuring the true danger to young women, too often distracted by cellphones or iPods in public places: the ancient sex crime of abduction and murder. Despite hysterical propaganda about our “rape culture,” the majority of campus incidents being carelessly described as sexual assault are not felonious rape (involving force or drugs) but oafish hookup melodramas, arising from mixed signals and imprudence on both sides.

The Race to Stop Ebola in Africa

Subscribe

Ebola Arrives in America

Driving While High

Colleges should stick to academics and stop their infantilizing supervision of students’ dating lives, an authoritarian intrusion that borders on violation of civil liberties. Real crimes should be reported to the police, not to haphazard and ill-trained campus grievance committees.

Too many young middleclass women, raised far from the urban streets, seem to expect adult life to be an extension of their comfortable, overprotected homes. But the world remains a wilderness. The price of women’s modern freedoms is personal responsibility for vigilance and self-defense.

Current educational codes, tracking liberal-Left, are perpetuating illusions about sex and gender. The basic Leftist premise, descending from Marxism, is that all problems in human life stem from an unjust society and that corrections and fine-tunings of that social mechanism will eventually bring utopia. Progressives have unquestioned faith in the perfectibility of mankind.

The horrors and atrocities of history have been edited out of primary and secondary education except where they can be blamed on racism, sexism, and imperialism — toxins embedded in oppressive outside structures that must be smashed and remade. But the real problem resides in human nature, which religion as well as great art sees as eternally torn by a war between the forces of darkness and light.

Liberalism lacks a profound sense of evil — but so does conservatism these days, when evil is facilely projected onto a foreign host of rising political forces united only in their rejection of Western values. Nothing is more simplistic than the now rote use by politicians and pundits of the cartoonish label “bad guys” for jihadists, as if American foreign policy is a slapdash script for a cowboy movie.

The gender ideology dominating academe denies that sex differences are rooted in biology and sees them instead as malleable fictions that can be revised at will. The assumption is that complaints and protests, enforced by sympathetic campus bureaucrats and government regulators, can and will fundamentally alter all men.

But extreme sex crimes like rape-murder emanate from a primitive level that even practical psychology no longer has a language for. Psychopathology, as in Richard von Krafft-Ebing’s grisly Psychopathia Sexualis (1886), was a central field in early psychoanalysis. But today’s therapy has morphed into happy talk, attitude adjustments, and pharmaceutical shortcuts.

There is a ritualistic symbolism at work in sex crime that most women do not grasp and therefore cannot arm themselves against. It is well-established that the visual faculties play a bigger role in male sexuality, which accounts for the greater male interest in pornography. The sexual stalker, who is often an alienated loser consumed with his own failures, is motivated by an atavistic hunting reflex. He is called a predator precisely because he turns his victims into prey.

Sex crime springs from fantasy, hallucination, delusion, and obsession. A random young woman becomes the scapegoat for a regressive rage against female sexual power: “You made me do this.” Academic clichés about the “commodification” of women under capitalism make little sense here: It is women’s superior biological status as magical life-creator that is profaned and annihilated by the barbarism of sex crime.

Misled by the naive optimism and “You go, girl!” boosterism of their upbringing, young women do not see the animal eyes glowing at them in the dark. They assume that bared flesh and sexy clothes are just a fashion statement containing no messages that might be misread and twisted by a psychotic. They do not understand the fragility of civilization and the constant nearness of savage nature.

Paglia is the author of Glittering Images: A Journey Through Art From Egypt to Star Wars.

http://time.com/3444749/camille-paglia-the-modern-campus-cannot-comprehend-evil/

Noe told his skateboard friend that “no one liked her here”

Noe's friend of his age went over to the little league baseball game near the bike shop, and told his friends and grown-ups watching the baseball game that “people can't stand her there”, meaning the bike shop.

So the people who don't like me and shown as such are Stephen Noe, Ever and Samara.  Where Noe and Ever trying to make everyone believed that no one in the bike shop liked me, and had been coercing other kids to shun me.  Stephen had led the effort.  This is the same tactic used by people from Asia in the Silicon Valley as well in the Patent and Trademark Office such as Tuan Nguyen on my classmates; in addition to Hung Havan, Michele Choi, Nathan Hillery, Susanne Lo and her friend from India, as well Tuan Nguyen's countrymen/women on USPTO employees/management.

I had given Noe and Ever my blog website address so they know what happened to me, they are obviously using the same tactic to further the defamation. They are just High School kids, and showing a malevolent side in such a tender age. Whoever in their path, watch out.   

Even kids like Noe and Ever understand and used this tactic to do their dirty deeds on me out of racism, and anyone who is nefarious such as Andrew had or will partake in using the defamation to incite people to do harm to me such as sexual harass, abuse, termination, rape, physical harm and beheaded.  It is not safe here anymore.  The defamation in the bike shop will only re-enforce the defamation that started by people from Asia, and further spread the defamation.

The fact that Noe actively defaming me to everyone he knows is troubling.  It shown deep rooted hatreds and racism toward me when I've been extremely friendly toward him.  This kind of bad behavior is bad influence on other kids, there shouldn't be any tolerance toward this kind of bad behavior anywhere.

Dilemma

I am facing with the quandary of whether to treat my cancer or waiting my cancer to kill me or beheaded by the Tech industry (mainly, people from Asia), which ever come first.  If I treated my cancer, I would be forced to apply for welfare, which I abhor so much.

If I live, it is in a vein attempt of continuing my fight for women in the Science and Tech field, mainly not to behead women when excel in the job over the males.

My fibroid caused by all the chemicals used in semiconductor manufacturing may be the reason why I am an asexual. Anytime when my tumor turn into a malicious cancer, I should die as I don't have health insurance due to unemployment, thanks to the Republican Party/Tea Party. It is logical that I should die as the science and technology field do not allow women to excel over males in the field, since I can't afford healthcare to treat my illnesses despite I excelled in my jobs over males in Tech. Our society obviously doesn't want women who excelled in the Science and Technology field to live. So the Tech industry or the Patent and Trademark Office, particularly those from 3rd world Asia, don't need to kill me to shut me up, stoned me to death, burned or drown me as a witch. I will NOT accept charity or welfare as I am perfectly capable of working and had worked 3 jobs every summer since High School to put myself through school. There is no reason for me NOT to be a contributing member of society other than discrimination toward me as a woman who excel in the Science and Technology field, it should be fitting that such a woman should die, and I am just too tired fighting discriminations since elementary school. This way, women will always be remain as second class citizen, a man's world and a 2 caste society.