“deconstruction of the administrative state.”

“deconstruction of the administrative state.” 

 

So that’s what Bannon is up to: small and decentralized government; another word, back to the old Wild Wild West era where only the strongest and the meanest survived.  This is just soooo old school, and would’ve been ahead of its time during the Clinton/Bush 41 Presidency; but is so outdated for today and the future.  If Bannon indeed read all those books, he should understand this.  Bannon should use this opportunity to prepare the population for the future where most jobs will be performed by robots.  If people said we needed to get rid of cars so horse owners can still make a living, does this make sense to you? 

The world is at a critical juncture, an inflection point of globalization and Digital Revolution (akin to the Industrial Revolution).  The last globalization ended in WWII, now added Digital Revolution to the mix.......

And please, don't raise girls as a princess, forcryingoutloud!!! 
 

Instead of the continuation of “survival of the fittest” since the beginning of life forms, human should evolve to the next level where human will focus on aspirations, where human are free and focus on innovation, creation, etc; instead of trying to survive and pay the bills.

 

So, what am I saying?  That citizen should have a mean to live on while doing creative things.  Some of the more advance countries in Europe are ahead of us, such as Switzerland “Every month, every Swiss person would receive a check from the government, no matter how rich or poor, how hardworking or lazy, how old or young. Poverty would disappear “.http://nyti.ms/1yLAJh0

 

Communism failed, and so will laissez faire economics/capitalism, even partially implemented had resulted in the 2008 Global Financial Systemic meltdown begun by Reagan that resulted in the current loss of the Middle Class, and worsen by globalization and the Digital Revolution, also contribute to the dismantle of Glass–Steagall that resulted in the 2008 Global meltdown.  Another word, laissez faire economics is saying that Wall Streeters such as Gordon Gekko will do the right thing for society.

 

De-regulation, akin to Google saying the growth is slowing, let’s go back to doing things during the startup days.  You see how scary that is?

 

Case in point of laissez faire economics/capitalism where there is no law or regulation, apply to sports such as Football where everything goes, who will win the Super bowl if there is no rules?  Or the Olympics where Russia used every means to win, and now caught cheating using drugs.

 

Countries such as Japan and South Korea where a few companies dominated the economy and the only game in town, citizen are essentially slaves to those companies; what happened when you realized you are just a slave?  I’ve worked for 2 Japanese tech companies in the Silicon Valley, one of the managers just came from Japan 6 months ago, could barely speak English, told me the word I used “concise” is not a word.  Did I mention most of the males in the Silicon Valley could barely walk and chew gum at the same time, those from Asia couldn’t tell a toaster from a computer, yet when I completed one of the most complex chip process projects on time and within budget, the males from Asia took the credit, I was fired, and scums rise to the top and the Silicon Valley are now full of scums in top level management, just like the novel “Lord of the Flies”.  Then tech talking heads keep saying they can’t find qualified American candidates, need more H1Bs, and been using sophistries and logical fallacy to justify why so women in the Silicon Valley/Tech industry. (http://casesynopsis.blogspot.com/2016/01/logical-fallacy.html)

 

Countries with weak central government such as Mexico, India, etc, where a few men are filthy rich, and the rest of the population are dirt poor, because like Microsoft, they used their power to ensure they will dominated the market, especially those connected to the top government officials; unlike America where we had a strong Middle Class, and so we have the most Billionaires, and the most educated that led to the most aspired population (ie  Sci-Fi and TV shows such as Star Trek) that led to the most innovative country.

 

Microsoft had dominated the software since the 1980s.  It used it’s dominancy to destroy every software initiatives that might threatened Microsoft’s dominancy such as Linux and oh so many software startups, and lives destroyed in the process.  I didn’t want to go into software because there were so few jobs.

 

Europe was decentralized, and decided to form the European Union after realizing they can’t compete.  Also, Putin has been using divide and conquer in Europe.  If Bannon had read “The Art of War”, he should know this.

 

Bannon also should think about how a decentralized government similar to Europe competes with Russia and China. 

 

Neither Communism nor Laissez Faire economics/capitalism had taken human nature into consideration, therefore is dorm to fail. 

 

And Bannon’s boss’s antic of grabbing women’s genital is part of this “survival of the fittest” that is motivated by the most primitive instinct - to procreate to ensure the survival of our species.  

 

Human’s next challenge should be “to go where no human has gone before"; understand that earth will eventually destroy either by gravitational pulls into the Sun, asteroids, WWIII, etc; NOT to enable dirty old men get rich so they could grab women’s genital or watch naked teenage girls changing in beauty contests; or buy teenage girls as sex slaves and imported from India using H1B, by Indian dirty old businessmen in the Silicon Valley. 

Your Physics Professor didn't tell you that earth is being slowly pull toward the sun, and will eventual be destroy by the sun, if earth didn't destroy by an asteroid first?  You see why most scientists worth their salt have a different perspective on life, don't really care much about the superficial material world that held dare by the likes of Trump.  You are going to die and you can't take it with you.  Your molecules will scatter all over earth, and you might be breathing in one of Einstein's molecule now.

The eventual solution for the eventual destruction of earth is that we will be looking for habitable planets, and colonialized those planet, while those who chose to stay on a spaceship will do so as the spaceship flow through space aimlessly.

 

My commonsensical economics:

http://makingmycasestoday.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-commonsensical-economic-and-view-of.html

Before the commonsensical Economics, I posted this around Jan 2007:

Remember when Russia was so busy making wars with everybody, we focus on growing our economy?  Look what happened to Russia.  This Administration doesn't seem to learn from our own success or failure. 

 
 

I posted this on Craigslist.org in Jan 2007 regarding BushCo:

The disastrous failure of Bush Administration is a prime example of nepotism and incompetence at it's worst.  It failed at all level, that is why this is so amazingly unbelievable.  It is putting the whole world in arms race and nuclear proliferation, when U.S. Should've played a role at down playing threats between countries, especially when the raise of China, and the unstable gov't regimes in Russia, East European and South America.  U.S. A Superpower, should've played a role as a stabilizer in the world as our foreign policy based on diplomatic, not force, which should’ve passed on from Presidency to Presidency.

Problem with War on Terror by the BushCo, wasn't able to asses what they were dealing with on the first place.  Terrors were all over the world, they are amount everyday people, and they don't belong to a country.  It is against an ideology which is not understood by U.S..  Therefore, the strategy on War against Terrorists should plan accordingly, but instead, BushCo invaded Iraq. 

 

About the Chinese gov't in 2007:

The Chinese gov't do wanted to succeed in reforming China.  They will do everything to ensure China will be a major power, if not the Superpower.  In order to do, this is also true for any country, education is ult-most important, a good living standard and certain level of freedom are the basic must. 

But knowing the Chinese culture/characteristics, and history, since Mao's Cultural Revolution didn't changed much, Chinese are still practices self interests only with complete disregard to anyone and everything around them.  The gov't must ensure the gap between the rich and poor are relatively tolerable, wealth distribution are a must, otherwise they are back to pre-revolution where an elite few control most of the money and power in the country.  Which as you know, led to Communism.  I do agree Socialist is a good governing instruments for China, even Russia and India. 

When a country's elites control most of the wealth and power, such as India, Venezuela, and even Mexico just to name a few, where the poor barely have enough to eat, hand to mouth at best, there are no way a country can left herself out of .  In a capitalistic society, a corporation look to maximize profit, often with complete disregard for social justice.  The only way to save a country is to change the policy such the poor have an opportunity to get out of poverty, and be educated, I say a form of Socialist is a good way of given the poor the best chance. 

When Mao chose Communism ideology, whether it was base on his understanding of a corrupt Chinese culture, or he just wanted to give the poor a better chance in life.  Either way, Communism was chosen,  and the cultural revolution cleansed of all corrupted entities.  Unfortunately, his creation of the Red Guard replace the traditional corrupted entities.

  

[bos] Politics - World (Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.) You define Socialism as those who practices <ZenTechie> 2006-08-02 10:03:14 not by the true meaning of Socialism. This is equivalent of defining Muslim by terrorists who practices, not the actual meaning.

[bos] Politics - World (Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.) Human Nature practice by those less evolved. <ZenTechie> 2006-08-02 08:43:29 For those highly evolved, Socialism or similar social order is what they seek. The essence of Socialism is about respecting individual's right, not money, power and self gratification. I certainly hope in the future, all human beings are evolved enough to live in a socialist society. Well, one can dream.......

 

[sfo] Job Market (context)
I strongely support U.S. companies established <ZenTechie>
2006-12-14 15:28:19

their presence all over the world, instead importing people here to work in the U.S. where they will always feel like being treated like a StepChild whether it is true or not, as well continue to practice their third world bigotries, especially toward women.

These new comers will always believed their wage is less then typical Americans and treaded unfairly, since they can't do anything to the company or their manager, so they direct their hatreds toward their American co-workers, or steal trade secrets from the company to get even.

Most of these people came from dirt-poor, oppress culture and government, and so these unbalance, dysfunctional, desparate and bitter people are liable of doing anything. Some countries like China implemented Death Penelty to detour radical acts, unfortunetely are being abused by local corrupt governments.