So that’s what Bannon is up to: small and decentralized government; another word, back to the old Wild Wild West era where only the strongest and the meanest survived. This is just soooo old school, and would’ve been ahead of its time during the Clinton/Bush 41 Presidency; but is so outdated for today and the future. If Bannon indeed read all those books, he should understand this. Bannon should use this opportunity to prepare the population for the future where most jobs will be performed by robots. If people said we needed to get rid of cars so horse owners can still make a living, does this make sense to you?
The world is at a critical juncture, an inflection point of globalization and Digital Revolution (akin to the Industrial Revolution). The last globalization ended in WWII, now added Digital Revolution to the mix.......
And please, don't raise girls as a princess, forcryingoutloud!!!
Instead of the
continuation of “survival of the fittest” since the beginning of life forms,
human should evolve to the next level where human will focus on aspirations,
where human are free and focus on innovation, creation, etc; instead of trying
to survive and pay the bills.
So, what am I
saying? That citizen should have a mean
to live on while doing creative things.
Some of the more advance countries in Europe are ahead of us, such as Switzerland “Every month, every Swiss
person would receive a check from the government, no matter how rich or poor,
how hardworking or lazy, how old or young. Poverty would disappear “.http://nyti.ms/1yLAJh0
Communism
failed, and so will laissez faire economics/capitalism, even partially implemented
had resulted in the 2008 Global Financial Systemic meltdown begun by Reagan
that resulted in the current loss of the Middle Class, and worsen by globalization
and the Digital Revolution, also contribute to the dismantle of Glass–Steagall
that resulted in the 2008 Global meltdown.
Another word, laissez faire economics is saying that Wall Streeters such
as Gordon Gekko will do the right thing for society.
De-regulation,
akin to Google saying the growth is slowing, let’s go back to doing things
during the startup days. You see how
scary that is?
Countries
such as Japan and South Korea where a few companies dominated the economy and
the only game in town, citizen are essentially slaves to those companies; what
happened when you realized you are just a slave? I’ve worked for 2 Japanese tech companies in
the Silicon Valley, one of the managers just came from Japan 6 months ago,
could barely speak English, told me the word I used “concise” is not a
word. Did I mention most of the males in
the Silicon Valley could barely walk and chew gum at the same time, those from
Asia couldn’t tell a toaster from a computer, yet when I completed one of the
most complex chip process projects on time and within budget, the males from
Asia took the credit, I was fired, and scums rise to the top and the Silicon
Valley are now full of scums in top level management, just like the novel “Lord
of the Flies”. Then tech talking heads
keep saying they can’t find qualified American candidates, need more H1Bs, and
been using sophistries and logical fallacy to justify why so women in the
Silicon Valley/Tech industry. (http://casesynopsis.blogspot.com/2016/01/logical-fallacy.html)
Countries
with weak central government such as Mexico, India, etc, where a few men are
filthy rich, and the rest of the population are dirt poor, because like
Microsoft, they used their power to ensure they will dominated the market,
especially those connected to the top government officials; unlike America
where we had a strong Middle Class, and so we have the most Billionaires, and
the most educated that led to the most aspired population (ie Sci-Fi
and TV shows such as Star Trek) that led to the most innovative country.
Microsoft
had dominated the software since the 1980s.
It used it’s dominancy to destroy every software initiatives that might
threatened Microsoft’s dominancy such as Linux and oh so many software
startups, and lives destroyed in the process.
I didn’t want to go into software because there were so few jobs.
Europe
was decentralized, and decided to form the European Union after realizing they
can’t compete. Also, Putin has been
using divide and conquer in Europe. If
Bannon had read “The Art of War”, he should know this.
Bannon
also should think about how a decentralized government similar to Europe
competes with Russia and China.
Neither
Communism nor Laissez Faire economics/capitalism had taken human nature into
consideration, therefore is dorm to fail.
And
Bannon’s boss’s antic of grabbing women’s genital is part of this “survival of
the fittest” that is motivated by the most primitive instinct - to procreate to
ensure the survival of our species.
Human’s
next challenge should be “to go where no human has gone before";
understand that earth will eventually destroy either by gravitational pulls
into the Sun, asteroids, WWIII, etc; NOT to enable dirty old men get rich so
they could grab women’s genital or watch naked teenage girls changing in beauty
contests; or buy teenage girls as sex slaves and imported from India using H1B,
by Indian dirty old businessmen in the Silicon Valley.
Your Physics Professor didn't tell you that earth is being slowly pull toward the sun, and will eventual be destroy by the sun, if earth didn't destroy by an asteroid first? You see why most scientists worth their salt have a different perspective on life, don't really care much about the superficial material world that held dare by the likes of Trump. You are going to die and you can't take it with you. Your molecules will scatter all over earth, and you might be breathing in one of Einstein's molecule now.
The eventual solution for the eventual destruction of earth is that we will be looking for habitable planets, and colonialized those planet, while those who chose to stay on a spaceship will do so as the spaceship flow through space aimlessly.
My
commonsensical economics:
Before the commonsensical Economics, I posted this around Jan 2007:
Remember when Russia was so busy making wars with
everybody, we focus on growing our economy?
Look what happened to Russia . This Administration doesn't seem to learn
from our own success or failure.
Problem with War on Terror by the BushCo, wasn't
able to asses what they were dealing with on the first place. Terrors were all over the world, they are
amount everyday people, and they don't belong to a country. It is against an ideology which is not
understood by U.S. . Therefore, the strategy on War against
Terrorists should plan accordingly, but instead, BushCo invaded Iraq .
The Chinese gov't do wanted to succeed in
reforming China . They will do everything to ensure China will be a
major power, if not the Superpower. In
order to do, this is also true for any country, education is ult-most
important, a good living standard and certain level of freedom are the basic
must.
But knowing the Chinese
culture/characteristics, and history, since Mao's Cultural Revolution didn't
changed much, Chinese are still practices self interests only with complete
disregard to anyone and everything around them.
The gov't must ensure the gap between the rich and poor are relatively
tolerable, wealth distribution are a must, otherwise they are back to
pre-revolution where an elite few control most of the money and power in the
country. Which as you know, led to
Communism. I do agree Socialist is a
good governing instruments for China ,
even Russia and India .
When a country's elites control most of the
wealth and power, such as India ,
Venezuela , and even Mexico
just to name a few, where the poor barely have enough to eat, hand to mouth at
best, there are no way a country can left herself out of . In a capitalistic society, a corporation look
to maximize profit, often with complete disregard for social justice. The only way to save a country is to change
the policy such the poor have an opportunity to get out of poverty, and be
educated, I say a form of Socialist is a good way of given the poor the best
chance.
When Mao chose Communism ideology, whether it
was base on his understanding of a corrupt Chinese culture, or he just wanted
to give the poor a better chance in life.
Either way, Communism was chosen,
and the cultural revolution cleansed of all corrupted entities. Unfortunately, his creation of the Red Guard
replace the traditional corrupted entities.
[bos] Politics
- World (Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.)
You define Socialism as those who practices <ZenTechie> 2006-08-02 10:03:14 not by the true meaning of Socialism. This is equivalent of defining Muslim by terrorists who practices, not the actual meaning. |
[bos] Politics
- World (Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.)
Human Nature practice by those less evolved. <ZenTechie> 2006-08-02 08:43:29 For those highly evolved, Socialism or similar social order is what they seek. The essence of Socialism is about respecting individual's right, not money, power and self gratification. I certainly hope in the future, all human beings are evolved enough to live in a socialist society. Well, one can dream....... |
I strongely support U.S. companies established <ZenTechie>
2006-12-14 15:28:19
their presence all over the world, instead importing people here to work in the U.S. where they will always feel like being treated like a StepChild whether it is true or not, as well continue to practice their third world bigotries, especially toward women.
These new comers will always believed their wage is less then typical Americans and treaded unfairly, since they can't do anything to the company or their manager, so they direct their hatreds toward their American co-workers, or steal trade secrets from the company to get even.
Most of these people came from dirt-poor, oppress culture and government, and so these unbalance, dysfunctional, desparate and bitter people are liable of doing anything. Some countries like China implemented Death Penelty to detour radical acts, unfortunetely are being abused by local corrupt governments.