Window to a person

OFTEN, how a person view the world or judging others are based on their own practices and values.

For example, if I shared my good fortune, such as sharing the clothes my sister gave me, buy one get one free which I would give the free one to someone around me, or volunteering, which is part of practicing ZEN philosophy; there are people believed I have a self serving angle for doing such.  Well, the angle is for them to PAY FORWARD, and hopefully, their kids will have a better world to live in.



Another thought, if a race (ie African-American) been treated as I've been treated (http://eeoccase.blogspot.com/) in the Silicon Valley/Tech/USPTO/STEM for all their existence in America, and is still killed as target practice by corrupted law enforcement (a disgrace to all other law enforcements, and should be punished heavily); or put in jail for driving while black, and hanged herself in protest; how do you expect them to behave in our society??

 You Reap What You Sow

"They don't understand what she is saying"

this started by people from Asia that just arrived in the US, mainly the H1Bs in the Silicon Valley.  They expected me to speak their language (mainly Mandarin), which I don't.  When I did speak Chinese to them, they either don't understand what I was saying or make fun of me.  My Chinese is as good as their English. 

The Americans interpreted this as they don't understand me because of my English, regardless of my NYC English; while the Americans didn't say anything about the English spoken by these people from Asia; ie the English spoken by Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen/women. 

Tuan Nguyen instigated the defamation of me "no one wanted her; on one liked her; etc", then later "don't know what she is saying" while the whole class heard me spoke without out any problem like a New Yorker, where there were many spoke with a very heavy accent.  Of course, Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen/women were laughing at these stupid Americans among themselves (you will see a smirk on their face), while telling people "she got bad feng shui".

Then classmates such as Shawn Joseph helped promulgated the defamation/trolling to the rest of the class and to other classes.  Other classes then help spread to the rest of the USPTO, and USPTO employees, mostly people from Asia helped spread to the rest of the DC metro.  Shawn Joseph also had shunned me from the group when the class divided into groups to work on a project.  I introduced myself as a project lead/tech lead from the Silicon Valley during the class meet and greet.  Also had help explained some of the technical terms in the class, which Kamini Shah was the SPE Trainer and aware of my ability.  So in this group, Shawn Joseph pushed to elect another woman as the group lead, who did NOT challenged a male's superiority.  Shawn Joseph clearing understood the perception of discrimination.      

When I said "challenged", I don't mean in a confrontational way as I knew since High School that is NOT the right way (practicing Zen then); but by doing the job, sharing the knowledge by helping others.

Again, the 21st Century "The Emperor has no clothes" - people see what others told them to see, NOT what they are seeing.  That's because they just needed an excuse to discriminate, not that they are stupid or anything.  This wouldn't happen if I am just mediocre, as what a woman or a colored person should be, but NOT someone challenged their superiority.  Just the same as males don't like women in management or excelled in the job over them; and/or Whites don't like colored person in management, in position of telling them what to do or excelled in the job over them.

Another word, unconsciously, they are putting a woman/colored person in her place as such person is getting "uppity".

Over time, due to isolation as the resulted of defamation/trolling by these people from Asia, where I often spoken no more then 50 sentences in a year in the Silicon Valley for over a decade, that 'if you don't use it, you lose it', I had trouble speaking.  But like riding a bicycle, if I started talking, I eventual speak like a native as indicative during the June 02, 2011 meeting with Director Wendy Garber and Paul Rodriguez or anytime after Dec. 2010.

"you are old, no one wanted to marry you"

this sweet looking young Asian girl (Chinese/Vietnamese?) walked pass by me in the supermarket, and make this remark. 

They usually don't make any remark in front of me, but defamed/trolled me with the people around me, or behind my back.  Now they are feeling empower and dare to defame/troll me out in the open as they are getting more and more powerful in the US. 

stalked by this dirty old man pervert new housemate

in the house.  There is no escape.  If he trys anything, I will kill him!

Are these people's propinquity toward me as a Transhumanist, or as a Chinaman?  Most, if not all seeing me as a Chinaman, let alone a yokel dirty old man like him.

For those who done this to me, I hoped you the worse, for your love ones, you kids and generations to come.

How did I last this long without a job?

other then rent, I don't buy anything other then the necessities.  Cell phone is under $50 with free plan.  All my clothes are from sister.  Thx Sis.

As for food:  50cents of rice which I would cook a huge pot of porridge that last me for days to a week.  Then I would buy $2 worth of ground beef, then cooked with soy source to put in the porridge.  I would buy a large quantity of Freeze vegetable whenever is selling at $1, or Progresso soup at $1 = 1 meal.  I also buy fresh fruits (strawberry, grape, etc) for housemates to share whenever it is on sale.

Bile, venom and lies: How I was trolled on the Internet

This is also how the people from Asia trolled me in real life as soon as I arrived in the Silicon Valley.  I had to abscond from the Silicon Valley due to physical harm threats as the resulted.

Similarly, I was troll the 1st month I started my job with the Patent and Trademark Office by Tuan Nguyen and his countrymen/women, that is now being trolled in Arlington/Alexandria, VA and everywhere I went since; also resulted in sexual harassments, abuses, unable to secure a job, physical harm and rape threats, and 2 failed attempt beheadings on me in Arlington.

I had never met any of these people from Asia in my life.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/bile-venom-and-lies-how-i-was-trolled-on-the-internet/2016/01/14/62207a2c-baf8-11e5-829c-26ffb874a18d_story.html

By Fareed Zakaria Opinion writer January 14 at 9:47 PM 

Thomas Jefferson often argued that an educated public was crucial for the survival of self-government. We now live in an age in which that education takes place mostly through relatively new platforms. Social networks — Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc. — are the main mechanisms by which people receive and share facts, ideas and opinions. But what if they encourage misinformation, rumors and lies?

In a comprehensive new study of Facebook that analyzed posts made between 2010 and 2014, a group of scholars found that people mainly shared information that confirmed their prejudices, paying little attention to facts and veracity. (Hat tip to Cass Sunstein, the leading expert on this topic.) The result, the report says, is the “proliferation of biased narratives fomented by unsubstantiated rumors, mistrust and paranoia.” The authors specifically studied trolling — the creation of highly provocative, often false information, with the hope of spreading it widely. The report says that “many mechanisms cause false information to gain acceptance, which in turn generate false beliefs that, once adopted by an individual, are highly resistant to correction.”

As it happens, in recent weeks I was the target of a trolling campaign and saw exactly how it works. It started when an obscure website published a post titled “CNN host Fareed Zakaria calls for jihad rape of white women.” The story claimed that in my “private blog” I had urged the use of American women as “sex slaves” to depopulate the white race. The post further claimed that on my Twitter account, I had written the following line: “Every death of a white person brings tears of joy to my eyes.”

Disgusting. So much so that the item would collapse from its own weightlessness, right? Wrong. Here is what happened next: Hundreds of people began linking to it, tweeting and retweeting it, and adding their comments, which are too vulgar or racist to repeat. A few ultra-right-wing websites reprinted the story as fact. With each new cycle, the levels of hysteria rose, and people started demanding that I be fired, deported or killed. For a few days, the digital intimidation veered out into the real world. Some people called my house late one night and woke up and threatened my daughters, who are 7 and 12.

It would have taken a minute to click on the link and see that the original post was on a fake news site, one that claims to be satirical (though not very prominently). It would have taken simple common sense to realize the absurdity of the charge. But none of this mattered. The people spreading this story were not interested in the facts; they were interested in feeding prejudice. The original story was cleverly written to provide conspiracy theorists with enough ammunition to ignore evidence. It claimed that I had taken down the post after a few hours when I realized it “receive[d] negative attention.” So, when the occasional debunker would point out that there was no evidence of the post anywhere, it made little difference. When confronted with evidence that the story was utterly false, it only convinced many that there was a conspiracy and coverup.

In my own experience, conversations on Facebook are somewhat more civil, because people generally have to reveal their identities. But on Twitter and in other places — the online comments section of The Post, for example — people can be anonymous or have pseudonyms. And that is where bile and venom flow freely. The Post’s Dana Milbank recently quoted a tweet about a column of his that said, “Let’s not mince words: Milbank is an anti-white parasite and a bigoted kike supremacist.” The comments about me were often nastier.

Elizabeth Kolbert, writing in the New Yorker, recalled an experiment performed by two psychologists in 1970. They divided students into two groups based on their answers to a questionnaire: high prejudice and low prejudice. Each group was told to discuss controversial issues such as school busing and integrated housing. Then the questions were asked again. “The surveys revealed a striking pattern,” Kolbert noted. “Simply by talking to one another, the bigoted students had become more bigoted and the tolerant more tolerant.” This “group polarization” is now taking place at hyper speed, around the world. It is how radicalization happens and extremism spreads.

I love social media. But somehow we have to help create better mechanisms in it to distinguish between fact and falsehood. No matter how passionate people are, no matter how cleverly they can blog or tweet or troll, no matter how viral things get, lies are still lies.

Read more from Fareed Zakaria’s archive, follow him on Twitter or subscribe to his updates on Facebook.

Read more on this topic:
Catherine Rampell: Why does it take a famous father to stop cyber-trolls?
Former Reddit CEO Ellen Pao: The trolls are winning the battle for the Internet

Daniel W. Drezner: Dow trolling could become the new language of diplomacy
Anne Applebaum: Another reason to avoid reading the comments

Advancing the human race

Getting married and having kids been the norm as a way to ensure the survival of the human race. 

Now that the human race is at the top of the food chain, and not in great danger of being extinct unless an asteroid/planetoids hit Earth, in which case is games over for all anyway.  But the Earth will eventually crash into the Sun in a few million years (learned this in college as an Applied Physics researcher), that means in order for the human race to continue to exist, we need get out of Earth.

 And so, we probably should shift to a new paradigm of living a meaningful life, a life of aspiration/inspiration.

My Civil Case filed in the Eastern District of Virginia

The defendant attorneys for the United States Patent and Trademark Office IS the - Untied States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia. 

The website has very limited guidance for Pro Se.  The worst in the country.  One would think the site was build in the 1990s.  When I called or show up in person, some employees were very nice and helpful, but others were nasty and didn't know anything.

My case number:  Civil Action No.  1:15cv01375

There seems to be a conflict of interest.  Untied States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia should excuse themselves from this case.  Why is this appropriate?   It is indicative of America's judicial system is no different then that of Iran or South Korea - the government/King is the law of the land, and is rigged against women, minorities and the common folks such as I, as evidenced by the EEOC and EEOC Appeal rulings.


Consider the massive amount of people had intentionally and maliciously out to ruin my life, who I had never met in my life, from the Silicon Valley/Tech industry to the USPTO, and now the DC metro where 2 failed attempt beheadings on me to make this lawsuit go away.  It said that there are very few decent human beings.  I am treated just as if the Islamic Extremists/ISIS in the Middle East treated women and people different them such as Americans, where they beheaded publically.

Like this new yokel housemate that's been stalking me and thinking he has a chance since "no one wanted her; no one liked her; etc", many people were happy that "no wonder no one wants her; no wonder no one likes her; etc".

I will limited my warnings to the dangers ahead for America/Americans, as most had help people from Asia and some ghetto Asians to make me suffered to the point where I will kill myself. 

If there is such thing as Karma, I hoped the same will go to them.